All posts
September 22, 2026 · 7 min read

The best open-source feedback tools in 2026

If you want to own your customer feedback, run it on your own servers, or avoid per-user pricing, there's now a solid set of open-source options. We compared the actively maintained ones on license, stack, hosting, and what each is best at.

We build Crumb, which is on this list, so weigh our take accordingly. We've tried to describe every tool fairly, using its own site and source code, checked in September 2026.

At a glance

ToolLicenseStackHosted optionBest for
CrumbAGPL-3.0TypeScript, PostgresFree; from $19/mo flatB2B teams prioritizing by revenue
FiderAGPL-3.0Go, React, PostgresFree up to 250 posts; $25/moA simple public voting board
QuackbackAGPL-3.0TypeScript, Bun, PostgresFree; $29–99/moFeedback plus support tools in one
ClearFlaskApache-2.0JavaFrom $29/moA permissive license and whitelabeling
LogChimpAGPL-3.0 (open core)Node, Vue, Postgres—A lightweight board and roadmap

Crumb

github.com/vladharl/crumb

Crumb is built around one idea: tie every request to the account and ARR behind it. Customers send feedback from an in-app widget, and it lands in an inbox sorted by revenue. From there, requests group into initiatives, go to Linear, Jira, or GitHub as AI-drafted tickets, and the customer hears back automatically when they ship. It also has a public roadmap, HubSpot and Salesforce sync, and an MCP server for AI assistants. Less suited to: consumer apps or open-source projects that just want a public voting board; the AI features and one-click integrations are on Crumb Cloud.

Fider

fider.io

Fider is the most established open-source voting board. It does the core job well: post ideas, vote, comment, tag, and move ideas through statuses. A roadmap view arrived in 2026 (free when self-hosted, Pro on Fider Cloud), and it supports webhooks and OAuth sign-in. Less suited to: teams that need revenue context or built-in tracker and CRM integrations. See Crumb vs Fider.

Quackback

quackback.io

Quackback is a newer, fast-moving project with feedback boards, voting, a roadmap, a changelog, an AI agent, an MCP server, and integrations including Linear, Jira, Slack, HubSpot, and Stripe. It has grown into a broader support suite with an inbox, help center, and status page. Less suited to: teams that want a focused feedback tool rather than a support platform.

ClearFlask

clearflask.com

ClearFlask is the main permissively licensed option. It offers a roadmap, voting with credits, custom domains, SSO, whitelabeling, and GitHub and Intercom integrations. Less suited to: teams that want everything free when self-hosting, given the 100-post cap.

LogChimp

logchimp.app

LogChimp is a lightweight board-and-roadmap tool with branding and role-based access, and it is actively maintained. Less suited to: teams that need integrations; it covers the basics.

Tools to avoid for new projects

Astuto was a popular Rails-based option, but its repository was archived in January 2026. Feedbacky hasn't had a release since 2022. Both still work, but you'd be on your own for fixes.

How to choose

Frequently asked questions

What is the best open-source feedback tool?

It depends on the job. Fider is the simplest mature voting board. Quackback bundles feedback with support tools. ClearFlask is a permissively licensed option. Crumb is built for B2B SaaS teams that prioritize by customer revenue and want feedback pushed to Linear, Jira, or GitHub.

Which open-source feedback tools can I self-host for free?

Crumb, Fider, Quackback, and LogChimp are free to self-host under the AGPL. ClearFlask is Apache-2.0, and its self-hosted version is free up to 100 posts, with a paid license above that.

Is Astuto still maintained?

No. Astuto's GitHub repository was archived in January 2026, so we don't recommend starting a new project on it.

Try the one built around revenue.

Free and open source to self-host. One click to start on Crumb Cloud.